This website is no longer being updated.

GRDC Communities Logo

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

Are you losing potassium from your paddock – does it matter?

graphic with text 'Do potassium losses matter', stick madn scratching head considering soil K

Potassium (K) is being gradually removed from Australia’s cropping soils. Since 2002, average crop yields have increased but K fertiliser use has remained static at around 180 kt K/yr. Soil K reserves declined an average of 4 kg K/ha/yr over the last 20 years.  Most cropping paddocks have received no K fertiliser over that period.

In the higher rainfall Southern grain growing region, An IPNI survey found that:

  • less than 10% of fields received K
  • where applied, the average K application rate was 75 kg K/ha
  • over all paddocks K removal rates ranged up to 250 kg K/ha
  • only 6 of the 60 paddocks that applied K had a K surplus

Does potassium rundown matter?

Sandy soils are more likely to be potassium deficient. In heavier cropping soils, K reserves are likely to be sufficient to supply crops for many more seasons at current removal rates. Eventually though, K rundown will reduce paddock fertility.

Using NPIs to track potassium

Nutrient Performance Indicators (NPIs) track trends in nutrient management. They can help understand if soil K reserves are building up or running down, and in understanding how effective K applications have been.

Partial Nutrient Balance-K

PNB-K = K removed (kg/ha) / K applied (kg/ha)

PNB-K indicates whether a crop left the paddock with higher, lower or stable K reserves. Where soil test values are near critical, the goal is for average PNB-K to approach 0.9–1, to maintain soil fertility. Values above 1 indicate run down of soil K.

It is important to view the PNB-K balance in relation to K soil test levels. Many soils have high K reserves, but on low K soils depletion can cause deficiencies over time. Interpret PNB-K as a trend over years to see if soil reserves are increasing or declining.

In Southern Australian grain farms the median PNB-K was 3.0, most of which did not apply any K. On farms where K was applied (mainly in south-west Victoria) – most still had PNB-K >1. Soil K was still being depleted even where K fertiliser was being applied.

Partial Factor Productivity-K

PFP-K = grain produced (kg) / K applied (kg)

PFP-K describes the grain yield benefit from K fertiliser. Higher PFP values mean the crop yield responded strongly to the fertiliser. The normal range for PFP-K is 76–200. PFP-K can only be calculated where K fertiliser is applied.

Regional use of fertiliser K targets paddocks with clear deficiencies, where crop response to fertiliser K can be strong. PFP-K could be calculated for only a small number of farms, since K was applied to only 10% of the survey paddocks. On these farms the average PFP-K exceeded the reference range at 350 kg grain/kg K.  

The high PFP-K recorded on the few farms that used K fertiliser does not mean applying K is likely to be profitable. K is not a limiting nutrient in many locations.  

More

Potassium removal and use in Australia

Do you need lime and potassium? Apply both

More on Nutrient Performance Indicators:

Nutrient Performance Indicators for your paddocks

Level up your Nutrient Performance Indicators

Are you running down nitrogen? Do you know?

Is phosphorus building up in your paddock?

Review this article
Feedback
Share this:
Your feedback has been submitted